EconStor >
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main >
Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Universität Frankfurt a. M. >
Working Paper Series: Finance and Accounting, Universität Frankfurt a. M. >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/27773
  
Title:Economic Benefits of Adopting IFRS or US-GAAP: Have the Expected Costs of Equity Capital really decreased? PDF Logo
Authors:Daske, Holger
Issue Date:2004
Series/Report no.:Working paper series / Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften : Finance & Accounting 131
Abstract:The question whether the adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) will result in measurable economic benefits is of special policy relevance in particular given the European Union?s decision to require the application of IFRS by listed companies from 2005/2007. In this paper, I investigate the common conjecture that internationally recognized high quality reporting standards (IAS/IFRS or US-GAAP) reduce the cost of capital of adopting firms (e.g. Levitt 1998; IASB 2002). Building on Leuz/Verrecchia (2000), I use a set of German firms which preadopted such standards before 2005, but investigate the potential economic benefits by analyzing their expected cost of equity capital utilizing and customizing available implied estimation methods (e.g. Gebhardt/Lee/Swaminathan 2001, Easton/Taylor/Shroff/Sougiannis 2002, Easton 2004). Evidence from a sample of about 13,000 HGB, 4,500 IAS/IFRS and 3,000 US-GAAP firm-month observations in the period 1993-2002 generally fails to document lower expected cost of equity capital and therefore measurable economic benefits for firms applying IAS/IFRS or US-GAAP. Accordingly, I caution to state that reporting under internationally accepted standards, per se, lowers the cost of equity capital of adopting firms.
JEL:M41
Document Type:Working Paper
Appears in Collections:Working Paper Series: Finance and Accounting, Universität Frankfurt a. M.

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
833.pdf1.13 MBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX
Share on:http://hdl.handle.net/10419/27773

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.