Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/2774
Authors: 
Rehdanz, Katrin
Tol, Richard S. J.
Year of Publication: 
2002
Series/Report no.: 
FEEM Working Papers 2002,37
Abstract: 
This paper considers the question under what conditions domestic markets of emission permits would and should merge to become an international market. Emission permits are licenses, and so governments would need to recognize other countries’ permits. In a two-county model, we find that it is in both countries’ interests to form an international market, and it may even be beneficial to the environment. Three different policy instruments of the importing country are examined, namely a price instrument (tariff) and two quantity instruments (discount and import quota). All instruments restrict trade. The importing country (and regulator) prefers an import tariff and an import quota to a carbon discount. If the exporting country releases additional permits, the importing country should not try to keep total emissions constant, as that would be ineffective if not counterproductive. Instead, the importing country should aim to keep the total import constant; this would impose costs on the exporting country that are independent of the policy instrument; an import quota would be the cheapest option for the importing country. Compliance and liability issues constrain the market further. However, both the importing and the exporting country would prefer that the permit seller is liable in case of non-compliance, as sellers’ liability would less constrain the market.
Subjects: 
Climate change
Emissions trading
Environmental policy
Liability and compliance
JEL: 
Q25
Q28
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
688.85 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.