EconStor >
Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung (ZEW), Mannheim >
ZEW Discussion Papers >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/27703
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRennings, Klausen_US
dc.contributor.authorMarkewitz, Peteren_US
dc.contributor.authorVögele, Stefanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-05-18en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-01T09:45:28Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-01T09:45:28Z-
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/27703-
dc.description.abstractIn the discussion on innovations for sustainable development, radical innovations are frequently called for in order that the transformation of society to a system perceived as sustainable can succeed. The reason given for this is the greater environmental efficiency of these innovations. This hypothesis is, however, not supported by empirical evidence. Against the background of a globally increasing use of coal-burning power plants and the environmental impacts to be expected, the hypothesis that radical innovations are superior to incremental innovations is reviewed on the basis of fossil fuel power plants. This paper examines the diffusion of incremental and radical innovations in the field of power plants and the basic obstacles with which these innovations were confronted. To give an example, Pressurised Pulverised Coal Combustion (PPCC) as a radical innovation and supercritical coal-fired power plants as an incremental innovation are compared. An ex-post analysis of the German R&D portfolio in the past three decades in the field of power plants environmentally shows that technologies which were radical innovations had great difficulties in becoming accepted by possible investors. The future potential of radical innovations in the field of power plant technology is to be regarded as relatively low, especially due to comparatively high cost-pressure, the reluctance of utilities to take risks and the temporal dynamics of technological progress facilitating incremental innovations on the basis of conventional reference technology. The conclusion for future R&D work in the sector of large-scale power plants is that an innovation is more likely to succeed the more it follows established technological trajectories. In the context of energy market liberalisation, hardly any radical innovations are expected in this field of technology. The findings of this paper may also be helpful in evaluating risks or probabilities of success of technologies being developed. As an example technological trajectories currently favoured in CO2 capture are discussed.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherZentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung (ZEW) Mannheimen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesZEW Discussion Papers 09-021en_US
dc.subject.jelQ01en_US
dc.subject.jelQ55en_US
dc.subject.jelO31en_US
dc.subject.jelO33en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordRadical innovationsen_US
dc.subject.keywordincremental innovationsen_US
dc.subject.keywordcarbon capture storageen_US
dc.subject.keywordcoal power plantsen_US
dc.subject.stwKohlekraftwerken_US
dc.subject.stwUmwelttechniken_US
dc.subject.stwInnovationen_US
dc.subject.stwInnovationsdiffusionen_US
dc.subject.stwTechnischer Fortschritten_US
dc.subject.stwKohlenstoffsenkeen_US
dc.subject.stwErfolgsfaktoren_US
dc.subject.stwDeutschlanden_US
dc.titleHow clean is clean? Incremental versus radical technological change in coal-fired power plantsen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn599989858en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-
dc.identifier.repecRePEc:zbw:zewdip:09021-
Appears in Collections:ZEW Discussion Papers
Publikationen von Forscherinnen und Forschern des ZEW

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
599989858.PDF161.77 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.