Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/27682
Authors: 
Behr, Andreas
Tente, Sebastian
Year of Publication: 
2008
Series/Report no.: 
Discussion Paper Series 2: Banking and financial studies 2008,19
Abstract: 
The stochastic frontier analysis (Aigner et al., 1977, Meeusen and van de Broeck, 1977) is widely used to estimate individual efficiency scores. The basic idea lies in the introduction of an additive error term consisting of a noise and an inefficiency term. Most often the assumption of a half-normal distributed inefficiency term is applied, but other distributions are also discussed in relevant literature. The natural estimation method seems to be Maximum Likelihood (ML) estimation because of the parametric assumptions. But simulation results obtained for the half normal model indicate that a method of moments approach (MOM) (Olson et al., 1980) is superior for small and medium sized samples in combination with inefficiency not strongly dominating noise (Coelli, 1995). In this paper we provide detailed simulation results comparing the two estimation approaches for both the half-normal and the exponential approach to inefficiency. Based on the simulation results we obtain decision rules for the choice of the superior estimation approach. Both estimation methods, ML and MOM, are applied to a sample of German commercial banks based on the Bankscope database for estimation of cost efficiency scores.
Subjects: 
stochastic frontier
Maximum Likelihood
Method of moments
Bank efficiency
JEL: 
C13
D24
ISBN: 
978-3-86558-464-9
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
338.44 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.