EconStor >
Christian-Albrechts-Universität Kiel (CAU) >
Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre, Universität Kiel  >
Arbeitspapiere des Instituts für Betriebswirtschaftslehre, CAU Kiel >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/27679
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNaik, Prasad A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPeters, Kayen_US
dc.contributor.authorRaman, Kalyanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-08-12T07:38:24Z-
dc.date.available2009-08-12T07:38:24Z-
dc.date.issued2008en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/27679-
dc.description.abstractDe Fleur (1956) provides the earliest evidence of diminishing returns. He finds a common logarithmic pattern for leaflets dropped and message recalled in field experiment. Since then, many researchers have applied logarithmic or square root patterns to capture the effect of diminishing returns with their advertising response modeling across different media. But discussions with managers support the notion that the diminishing returns to incremental dollars spent on one medium (say, television) are not likely to be the same as those for equivalent dollars spent on other media (e.g., Print). But if diminishing returns indeed vary across media, how does that change the resulting allocation recommendation? To address this issue, we derive a dynamic model that captures the notion of differential diminishing returns and disentangles it from closely related notions of differential carryovers and differential ad effectiveness. Second, we develop a systematic method to estimate the model's parameters using market data and illustrate empirically that all three effects, diminishing returns, carryover and ad effectiveness vary across the four media employed. Finally, we investigate the normative implications for managerial decision-making. Here, we additionally account for varying media buying efficiencies across media. Taken together, the approach and its illustration should provide managers with a better toolkit to allocate their multimedia budgets.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft Kiel und Hamburgen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesArbeitspapiere des Lehrstuhls für Innovation, Neue Medien und Marketingen_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.titleHeterogeneous Response Functions in Advertisingen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn659402092-
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-
dc.identifier.repecRePEc:zbw:esprep:27679-
Appears in Collections:Arbeitspapiere des Instituts für Betriebswirtschaftslehre, CAU Kiel
Working and Discussion Papers / Arbeits- und Diskussionspapiere, EconStor Direct

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
2008_Naik_Peters_Raman_Druckfassung.pdf481.25 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.