EconStor >
arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre >
arqus Diskussionsbeiträge zur Quantitativen Steuerlehre >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/27056
  
Title:Die Fehlbewertung durch das Stuttgarter Verfahren: eine Sensitivitätsanalyse der Werttreiber von Steuer- und Marktwerten PDF Logo
Authors:Müller, Jens
Issue Date:2007
Series/Report no.:Arqus-Diskussionsbeiträge zur quantitativen Steuerlehre 25
Abstract:This paper focuses on firm valuation for tax purposes of non-listed company shares and its sensitivity towards different market conditions. Since the value of a private company cannot be observed on the stock market the value has to be estimated. Due to uncertainty, expected future profits may not serve as a tax base. Therefore, in Germany e.g., a tax value is derived on the basis of a combination of net assets and historic profits - the so called Stuttgart Method. A Discounted Cash Flow Model, as a generally accepted method of firm valuation, is used as a proxy for the market value. In this analysis a simulation quantifies the gap between both approaches for firms of six different industries. Thereby, we find out which industries are discriminated and which are subsidized by taxation. Furthermore, the sensitivity of the value gap with regard to the relevant value drivers (cost of capital, financial structure, corporate tax rates, growth, and timing effects) is investigated. In the basic setting the value is only 31,3% to 92,4% of the market value. Thus, tax values lead to a severe undervaluation of the company. Moreover, the span of the relations shows that the firms are treated unequally. Variations show that overvaluations are also likely to be observed. These results are helpful to design a true and fair tax base.
Subjects:firm valuation
gift tax
inheritance tax
tax value
sensitivity analysis
value gap
discounted cash flow
JEL:G12
H29
Document Type:Working Paper
Appears in Collections:arqus Diskussionsbeiträge zur Quantitativen Steuerlehre

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
527780847.PDF323.56 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX
Share on:http://hdl.handle.net/10419/27056

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.