Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/26215
Authors: 
Amegashie, J. Atsu
Year of Publication: 
2007
Series/Report no.: 
CESifo working paper 2171
Abstract: 
In the very popular FOX TV reality show, American Idol, the judges, who are presumably experts in evaluating singing effort, have no voting power when the field is narrowed to the top twenty-four contestants. It is only the votes of viewers that count. In the 2007 season of the show, one of the judges, Simon Cowell, threatened to quit the show if a contestant, Sanjaya Malakar, who was clearly a low-ability contestant, won the competition. He was concerned that the show was becoming a popularity contest instead of a singing contest. Is this a problem? Not necessarily. I show that, under certain conditions, making success in the contest dependent on a contestant’s popularity and not solely on her singing ability or performance, could paradoxically increase aggregate singing effort. It may be optimal to give the entire voting power to the viewers whose evaluation of singing effort or ability is noisier.
Subjects: 
American Idol
contests
tournaments
JEL: 
D23
D44
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
154.74 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.