Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/26017
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBorck, Rainalden_US
dc.contributor.authorWrede, Matthiasen_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-07-24en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-28T08:14:55Z-
dc.date.available2009-07-28T08:14:55Z-
dc.date.issued2007en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/26017-
dc.description.abstractWe study a simple model of commuting subsidies with two transport modes. City residents choose where to live and which mode to use. When all land is owned by city residents, one group gains from subsidies what the other loses. With absentee landownership, city residents as a group gain at the expense of landowners. Subsidies toward different modes have different effects, however, for instance, in one case, rich automobile drivers suffer from transit subsidies, while poor transit users may benefit from subsidies to automobiles.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisher|aCenter for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute (CESifo) |cMunichen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aCESifo working paper|x1972en_US
dc.subject.jelR14en_US
dc.subject.jelR48en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.stwPendelverkehren_US
dc.subject.stwVerkehrssubventionen_US
dc.subject.stwVerkehrsmittelwahlen_US
dc.subject.stwVerteilungswirkungen_US
dc.subject.stwWohnstandorten_US
dc.subject.stwTheorieen_US
dc.titleCommuting subsidies with two transport modesen_US
dc.type|aWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn53817210Xen_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-

Files in This Item:
File
Size
149.28 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.