Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/25407
Authors: 
Tykvová, Tereza
Walz, Uwe
Year of Publication: 
2004
Series/Report no.: 
CFS Working Paper 2004/02
Abstract: 
This paper aims to analyze the impact of different types of venture capitalists on the performance of their portfolio firms around and after the IPO. We thereby investigate the hypothesis that different governance structures, objectives and track record of different types of VCs have a significant impact on their respective IPOs. We explore this hypothesis by using a data set embracing all IPOs which occurred on Germany’s Neuer Markt. Our main finding is that significant differences among the different VCs exist. Firms backed by independent VCs perform significantly better two years after the IPO compared to all other IPOs and their share prices fluctuate less than those of their counterparts in this period of time. Obviously, independent VCs, which concentrated mainly on growth stocks (low bookto- market ratio) and large firms (high market value), were able to add value by leading to less post-IPO idiosyncratic risk and more return (after controlling for all other effects). On the contrary, firms backed by public VCs (being small and having a high book-to-market ratio) showed relative underperformance.
Subjects: 
Venture Capital
Initial Public Offerings
Long-Run Performance
Underpricing
JEL: 
G10
G14
G24
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
637.17 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.