EconStor >
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin >
Sonderforschungsbereich 649: Ökonomisches Risiko, Humboldt-Universität Berlin >
SFB 649 Discussion Papers, HU Berlin >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/25242
  
Title:Telling the truth may not pay off: an empirical study of centralised university admissions in Germany PDF Logo
Authors:Braun, Sebastian
Dwenger, Nadja
Kübler, Dorothea
Issue Date:2007
Series/Report no.:SFB 649 discussion paper 2007,070
Abstract:We investigate the matching algorithm used by the German central clearinghouse for university admissions (ZVS) in medicine and related subjects. This mechanism consists of three procedures based on final grades from school (Abiturbestenverfahren, Auswahlverfahren der Hochschulen) and on waiting time (Wartezeitverfahren). While these procedures differ in the criteria applied for admission they all make use of priority matching. In priority matching schemes, it is not a dominant strategy for students to submit their true preferences. Thus, strategic behaviour is expected. Using the full data set of applicants, we are able to detect some amount of strategic behaviour which can lead to inefficient matching. Alternative ways to organize the market are briefly discussed.
Subjects:Matching
university admissions
strategic behaviour
JEL:C78
D02
D78
I29
Document Type:Working Paper
Appears in Collections:Publikationen von Forscherinnen und Forschern des DIW
SFB 649 Discussion Papers, HU Berlin

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
558654479.PDF941.31 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX
Share on:http://hdl.handle.net/10419/25242

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.