EconStor >
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin >
Sonderforschungsbereich 649: Ökonomisches Risiko, Humboldt-Universität Berlin >
SFB 649 Discussion Papers, HU Berlin >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/25075
  
Title:Stock markets and business cvycle comovement in Germany before World War I: evidence from spectral analysis PDF Logo
Authors:Ritschl, Albrecht
Uebele, Martin
Issue Date:2005
Series/Report no.:SFB 649 discussion paper 2005,056
Abstract:This paper examines the comovement of the stock market and of real activity in Germany before World War I under the efficient market hypothesis. We employ multivariate spectral analysis to compare rivaling national product estimates to stock market behavior in the frequency domain. Close comovement of one series with the stock market enables us to decide between various rivaling business cycle chronologies. We find that business cycle dates obtained from deflated national product series are severely distorted by interference with the implicit price deflator. Among the nominal series, the income estimate of Hoffmann (1965) correlates best with the stock market, while the tax based estimate of Hoffmann and Müller (1959) is too smooth especially before 1890. We find impressive comovement between the stock market and nominal wages, a sub-series of Hoffmann's income estimate. We can show that a substantial part of this nominal wage series is driven by data on real investment activity. Our findings confirm the traditional business cycle chronology for Germany of Burns and Mitchell (1946) and Spiethoff (1955), and lead us to discard later, rivaling business cycle chronologies.
Subjects:Business Cycle Chronology
Imperial Germany
Spectral Analysis
Efficient Market Hypothesis
JEL:E32
E44
N13
Document Type:Working Paper
Appears in Collections:SFB 649 Discussion Papers, HU Berlin

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
512452970.PDF559.42 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX
Share on:http://hdl.handle.net/10419/25075

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.