|
EconStor >
Institut für Weltwirtschaft (IfW), Kiel >
Kieler Arbeitspapiere, IfW >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10419/24834
|
| | |
Full metadata record
| DC Field | | Value | | Language |
| dc.contributor.author | | Morkre, Morris | | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | | Spinanger, Dean | | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | | Tran, Lien | | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | | 2008-08-29 | | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | | 2009-04-06T10:14:20Z | | - |
| dc.date.available | | 2009-04-06T10:14:20Z | | - |
| dc.date.issued | | 2008 | | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | | Kiel working paper 1438 Kiel Inst. for the World Economy, Kiel | | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | | http://hdl.handle.net/10419/24834 | | - |
| dc.description.abstract | | This paper investigates the effects of U.S. AD actions on DCs. It first considers administrative actions by the U.S. Department of Commerce, which decides AD margins for countries. It then considers decision making by the U.S. International Trade Commission, which determines injury to domestic industry. The econometric results show that USDOC actions lead to significantly higher AD margins for NMEs (all DCs) than for MOEs. Among countries that suffer from U.S. AD actions DCs have a significantly higher ratio of dumped imports to total imports (relative dumped imports) compared with middle income countries. However, the results also show that relative dumped imports of high income countries are also greater than middle income countries. | | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | | eng | | en_US |
| dc.publisher | | Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW) Kiel | | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | | Kiel working paper 1438 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.jel | | F13 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.jel | | K42 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.ddc | | 330 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | Antidumping (AD) | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | AD margin | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | developing countries (DCs) | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | market-oriented economies (MOEs) | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | nonmarket economies (NME) | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | relative dumped imports | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | underselling | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | zeroing | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Antidumping | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Amerikanisch | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Wirtschaftspolitische Wirkungsanalyse | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Außenhandelseffekt | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Vergleich | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Entwicklungsländer | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Welt | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | USA | | en_US |
| dc.title | | Are unfair import laws unfair to developing countries : evidence from US antidumping actions 1990 - 2004 | | en_US |
| dc.type | | Working Paper | | en_US |
| dc.identifier.ppn | | 575644184 | | en_US |
| dc.rights | | http://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen | | - |
| Appears in Collections: | | Publikationen von Forscherinnen und Forschern des IfW Kieler Arbeitspapiere, IfW
|
Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|