EconStor >
Christian-Albrechts-Universität Kiel (CAU) >
Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre, Universität Kiel  >
Arbeitspapiere des Instituts für Betriebswirtschaftslehre, CAU Kiel >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/24827
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAlbers, Sönkeen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-03-31T06:58:57Z-
dc.date.available2009-03-31T06:58:57Z-
dc.date.issued2009-03-31T06:58:57Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/24827-
dc.description.abstractThe attempts by Schulze, Warning, and Wiermann (2008) and Ritzberger (2008) to develop a joint ranking list of journals for economics and business research are critically evaluated. Their lists suggest that the quality of top business journals is substantially lower than that of many economics journals. If, however, the authors of these lists do not want to claim a general superiority of one discipline (economics) over another one (business), they should give a clear indication that these lists are only applicable for economists. This warning appears necessary because Fabel, Hein, and Hofmeister (2008) derive a ranking of universities and departments with respect to research productivity in business from the business research discriminating list RbR_IMP by Schulze et al. While Diamantopoulos and Wagner (2008) already show a lack of face-validity of these results, this article explains that the reason for this lies not only in the degrading and also biased weighting of the business journals across subfields, but even more importantly, in a remarkable incompleteness of the data base.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft Kiel und Hamburg-
dc.subject.jelA12en_US
dc.subject.jelI23en_US
dc.subject.jelM00en_US
dc.subject.ddc650en_US
dc.subject.keywordJournal rankingen_US
dc.subject.keywordUniversity rankingen_US
dc.titleDiscriminating Rankings of Research in Business-
dc.typePreprint-
dc.identifier.ppn626303516-
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-
dc.identifier.repecRePEc:zbw:esprep:24827-
Appears in Collections:Working and Discussion Papers / Arbeits- und Diskussionspapiere, EconStor Direct
Arbeitspapiere des Instituts für Betriebswirtschaftslehre, CAU Kiel

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Albers Rankings in Business Reply for GER V9.pdf50.88 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.