|
EconStor >
Europa-Universität Viadrina Frankfurt (Oder) >
Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät, Europa-Universität Viadrina >
Diskussionspapiere, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät, Europa-Universität Viadrina >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10419/23812
|
| | |
Full metadata record
| DC Field | | Value | | Language |
| dc.contributor.author | | Kritikos, Alexander S. | | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | | Tan, Jonathan H. W. | | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | | 2009-01-30T12:03:05Z | | - |
| dc.date.available | | 2009-01-30T12:03:05Z | | - |
| dc.date.issued | | 2005 | | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | | http://hdl.handle.net/10419/23812 | | - |
| dc.description.abstract | | How can a principal (an agent) ensure that an agent (a principal) will work (pay up), if payment (work) precedes work (payment)? When a banknote is torn in two, each part is by itself worthless. A principal can pre-commit to payment-on-delivery, by tearing a banknote and giving the agent the first half as "prepayment"; the agent receives the completing half upon delivery of the service. This contract design is known as "indenture". It is self-enforcing and incentive-compatible. This paper experimentally tests the efficacy of the "indenture game" and its implications for cooperation in oneshot environments. We find that cooperation rates are high and stable over time. Its efficacy is moderated by expected losses due to the existence of uncooperative types. | | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | | eng | | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | | Diskussionspapiere / Europa-Universität Viadrina Frankfurt (Oder), Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät 241 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.jel | | C91 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.jel | | J41 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.jel | | D64 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.ddc | | 330 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | Cooperation | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | Experiment | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | Contracts | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | Indenture | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | Reciprocity | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Agency Theory | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Spieltheorie | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Anreizvertrag | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Experiment | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Theorie | | en_US |
| dc.title | | Indenture as a Commitment Device in Self-Enforced Contracts: An Experimental Test | | en_US |
| dc.type | | Working Paper | | en_US |
| dc.identifier.ppn | | 500818169 | | en_US |
| dc.rights | | http://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen | | - |
| Appears in Collections: | | Diskussionspapiere, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät, Europa-Universität Viadrina
|
| Files in This Item:
| |
|
| No. of Downloads:
| |
| last Month |
last 3 Month |
total |
|
|
|
|
|
Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|