EconStor >
Williams College >
Williams Project on the Economics of Higher Education, Williams College >
WPEHE Discussion Paper Series, Williams College >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/23512
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWinston, Gordon C.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-01-29T16:09:44Z-
dc.date.available2009-01-29T16:09:44Z-
dc.date.issued2003en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/23512-
dc.description.abstractCollege tuition, as the price of higher education services, defies familiar economic analysis in important ways. It is recognized that tuition is a price that covers only a fraction of the cost of producing those educational services (about a third, nationally), creating an in-kind subsidy for students (the balance being made up by large flows of donative resources from gifts, appropriations, and returns on wealth). This paper examines yet another important economic peculiarity of tuition; it takes seriously input and output markets implied by Rothschild-White (1995 JPE) in which a single event – of a student?s matriculation – is simultaneously a transaction in both an input market (where a wage is paid for a student?s peer quality) and an output market (where a price is paid for the college?s educational services). Those two prices are obscured by the fact that the peer wage is paid in the form of a discount on the price of educational services as well as by the fact that the schools? sales (tuition) revenues are significantly augmented by those donated resources. This framing sees a school?s access to donated resources (wealth) critical in determining which market – peer quality inputs or educational services sales – will most influence its behavior. Apparent anomalies in the product market – like queues of unsatisfied customers that persist while schools refuse to expand capacity – disappear when they are seen to be the result of an input market where a queue of job applicants is used to allow the firm to select on worker – peer – quality (the result of an Akerlof- Yellen efficiency wage).en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisheren_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWPEHE discussion paper series / Williams College, Williams Project on the Economics of Higher Education 65en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.stwStudienfinanzierungen_US
dc.subject.stwWettbewerben_US
dc.subject.stwLohnen_US
dc.subject.stwMarktmechanismusen_US
dc.subject.stwBildungsökonomiken_US
dc.subject.stwTheorieen_US
dc.titleToward a Theory of Tuition: Prices, Peer Wages, and Competition in Higher Educationen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn366111388en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-
Appears in Collections:WPEHE Discussion Paper Series, Williams College

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
DP-65.pdf88.19 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.