EconStor >
Williams College >
Williams Project on the Economics of Higher Education, Williams College >
WPEHE Discussion Paper Series, Williams College >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGoethals, George R.en_US
dc.description.abstractA study was conducted to examine peer effects among undergraduates at Williams College, a highly selective four-year liberal arts school. Specifically, the study explored whether students would perform better writing about newspaper articles they read and discussed in academically homogeneous or heterogeneous groups of three. In homogeneous groups all three students were from either the top half or bottom half of their class on academic ratings assigned at the time of admission. Heterogeneous groups included students from both the top and bottom half of their class. The results showed that students in the top and bottom half performed similarly overall, but that students performed better in homogeneous groups, whether those homogeneous groups were made up of students in the top half or the bottom half of their classes. This pattern of results was stronger for men subjects than women subjects. The results were interpreted in terms of the principles of social comparison theory (Festinger, 1954).en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWPEHE discussion paper series / Williams College, Williams Project on the Economics of Higher Education 61en_US
dc.subject.stwpeer effectsen_US
dc.titlePeer effects, gender, and intellectual performance among students at a highly selective college : a social comparison of abilities analysisen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
Appears in Collections:WPEHE Discussion Paper Series, Williams College

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
DP-61.pdf42.53 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.