EconStor >
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main >
Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Universität Frankfurt a. M. >
Working Paper Series: Finance and Accounting, Universität Frankfurt a. M. >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/23428
  
Title:Does the Stock Market React to Unsolicited Ratings? PDF Logo
Authors:Behr, Patrick
Güttler, André
Issue Date:2006
Series/Report no.:Working paper series / Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften : Finance & Accounting 163
Abstract:This paper investigates whether the stock market reacts to unsolicited ratings for a sample of S&P rated firms from January 1996 to December 2005. We first analyze the stock market reaction associated with the assignment of an initial unsolicited rating. We find evidence that this reaction is negative and particularly accentuated for Japanese firms. A comparison between S&P?s initial unsolicited ratings with previously published ratings of two Japanese rating agencies for a Japanese subsample shows that ratings assigned by S&P are systematically worse. Further, we find that the stock market does not react to the transition from an unsolicited to a solicited rating. Comparison of the upgrades in the sample with a matched-sample of upgrades of solicited ratings reveals that the price reactions are no different. In addition, abnormal returns are worse for firms whose rating remained unchanged after the solicitation compared to those for upgraded firms. Finally, we find that Japanese firms are less likely to receive an upgrade. Our findings suggest that unsolicited ratings are biased downwards, that the capital market therefore expects upgrades of formerly unsolicited ratings and punishes firms whose ratings remain unchanged. All these effects seem to be more pronounced for Japanese firms.
JEL:G23
G14
Document Type:Working Paper
Appears in Collections:Working Paper Series: Finance and Accounting, Universität Frankfurt a. M.

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
1234.pdf266.89 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX
Share on:http://hdl.handle.net/10419/23428

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.