Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/23423
Authors: 
Serifsoy, Baris
Year of Publication: 
2005
Series/Report no.: 
Working paper series / Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften : Finance & Accounting 158
Abstract: 
In recent years stock exchanges have been increasingly diversifying their operations into related business areas such as derivatives trading, post-trading services and software sales. This trend can be observed most notably among profit-oriented trading venues. While the pursuit for diversification is likely to be driven by the attractiveness of these investment opportunities, it is yet an open question whether certain integration activities are also efficient, both from a social welfare and from the exchanges' perspective. Academic contributions so far analyzed different business models primarily from the social welfare perspective, whereas there is only little literature considering their impact on the exchange itself. By employing a panel data set of 28 stock exchanges for the years 1999-2003 we seek to shed light on this topic by comparing the factor productivity of exchanges with different business models. Our findings suggest three conclusions: (1) Integration activity comes at the cost of increased operational complexity which in some cases outweigh the potential synergies between related activities and therefore leads to technical inefficiencies and lower productivity growth. (2) We find no evidence that vertical integration is more efficient and productive than other business models. This finding could contribute to the ongoing discussion about the merits of vertical integration from a social welfare perspective. (3) The existence of a strong in-house IT-competence seems to be beneficial to overcome lower productivity growth associated with complex business models.
Subjects: 
exchanges
demutualization
post-trading
derivatives
software
DEA
Malmquist-Productivity
bootstrapping
JEL: 
C61
C24
F39
C23
G32
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
492.9 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.