EconStor >
Rutgers University >
Department of Economics, Rutgers University >
Working Papers, Department of Economics, Rutgers University >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/23178
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCorradi, Valentinaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSwanson, Norman R.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-01-29T15:49:15Z-
dc.date.available2009-01-29T15:49:15Z-
dc.date.issued2003en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/23178-
dc.description.abstractIn the conduct of empirical macroeconomic research, unit root, cointegration, common cycle, and related test statistics are often constructed using logged data, even though there is often no clear reason, at least from an empirical perspective, why logs should be used rather than levels. Unfortunately, it is also the case that standard data transformation tests, such as those based on Box-Cox transformation, cannot be shown to be consistent unless the assumption is made concerning whether the series being examined is I(0) or I(1), so that a sort of circular testing problem exists. In this paper, we discuss two quite different but related issues that arise in the context of data transformation. First, we address the circular testing problem that arises when choosing data transformation and order of integratedness. In particular, we propose a simple randomized procedure, coupled with simple conditioning, for choosing between levels and log-levels specifications in the presence of deterministic and/or stochastic trends. Second, we note that even if pre-testing is not undertaken to determine data transformation, it is important to be aware of the impact that incorrect data transformation has on tests frequently used in empirical works. For this reason, we carry out a series of Monte Carlo experiments illustrating the rather substantive effect that incorrect transformation can have on the finite sample performance of common feature and cointegration tests. These Monte Carlo findings underscore the importance of either using economic theory as a guide to data transformation and/or using econometric tests such as discussed in this paper as aids when choosing data transformation.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisheren_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking papers / Rutgers University, Department of Economics 2003,22en_US
dc.subject.jelC22en_US
dc.subject.jelC12en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordcommon cyclesen_US
dc.subject.keywordcommon trendsen_US
dc.subject.keywordnonlinear transformationen_US
dc.subject.keywordnon stationarityen_US
dc.subject.keywordrandomised procedureen_US
dc.subject.stwStatistischer Testen_US
dc.subject.stwKointegrationen_US
dc.subject.stwUnit Root Testen_US
dc.subject.stwZeitreihenanalyseen_US
dc.subject.stwTheorieen_US
dc.titleThe Effect of Data Transformation on Common Cycle, Cointegration and Unit Root Tests : Monte Carlo Results and a Simple Testen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn375476954en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-
Appears in Collections:Working Papers, Department of Economics, Rutgers University

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
2003-22.pdf1.83 MBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.