EconStor >
Rutgers University >
Department of Economics, Rutgers University >
Working Papers, Department of Economics, Rutgers University >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/23173
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCorradi, Valentinaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSwanson, Norman R.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-01-29T15:49:11Z-
dc.date.available2009-01-29T15:49:11Z-
dc.date.issued2003en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/23173-
dc.description.abstractForecasters and applied econometricians are often interested in comparing the predictive accuracy of nested competing models. A leading example of nestedness is when predictive ability is equated with ?out-of-sample Granger causality?. In particular, it is often of interest to assess whether historical data from one variable are useful when constructing a forecasting model for another variable, and hence our use of terminology such as ?out-of-sample Granger causality? (see e.g. Ashley, Granger and Schmalensee (1980)). In this paper we examine and discuss three key issues one is faced with when constructing predictive accuracy tests, namely: the contribution of parameter estimation error, the choice of linear versus nonlinear models, and the issue of (dynamic) misspecification, with primary focus on the latter of these issues. One of our main conclusions is that there are a number of easy to apply statistics constructed using out of sample conditional moment conditions which are robust to the presence of dynamic misspecification under both hypothesis. We provide some new Monte Carlo findings and empirical evidence based on the use of such tests. In particular, we analyze the finite sample properties of the consistent out of sample test of Corradi and Swanson (2002) using data generating processes calibrated with U.S. money and output, and empirically investigate the (non)linear marginal predictive content of money for output. Our Monte Carlo evidence suggests that the tests perform adequately in finite samples, and our empirical evidence suggests that there is non useful (non)linear information in money growth that is not already contained in lags of output growth, when the objective is output growth prediction.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisheren_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking papers / Rutgers University, Department of Economics 2003,16en_US
dc.subject.jelC51en_US
dc.subject.jelC22en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordConditional p-valueen_US
dc.subject.keywordbootstrapen_US
dc.subject.keywordforecastingen_US
dc.subject.keywordout-of-sample predictive accuracyen_US
dc.subject.keywordparameter estimation erroren_US
dc.subject.stwStatistischer Testen_US
dc.subject.stwPrognoseverfahrenen_US
dc.subject.stwBootstrap-Verfahrenen_US
dc.subject.stwTheorieen_US
dc.titleSome Recent Developments in Predictive Accuracy Testing With Nested Models and (Generic) Nonlinear Alternativesen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn375470077en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-
Appears in Collections:Working Papers, Department of Economics, Rutgers University

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
2003-16.pdf236.23 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.