EconStor >
Rutgers University >
Department of Economics, Rutgers University >
Working Papers, Department of Economics, Rutgers University >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/23164
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSigman, Hilaryen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-01-29T15:49:06Z-
dc.date.available2009-01-29T15:49:06Z-
dc.date.issued2003en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/23164-
dc.description.abstractMany states in the US impose taxes on hazardous waste. This paper conducts an empirical evaluation of the determinants of these taxes and reviews earlier research on their effects on hazardous waste. Earlier studies have shown that the taxes affect waste management, but my results and other evidence suggest that the tax-induced changes may not have improved welfare. Taxes on industrial hazardous waste are one of the most extensive uses of pollution taxes in the United States. The federal government and many states governments have implemented such taxes. The diversity of hazardous waste taxes makes them an interesting example of pollution taxes because we can compare the responses of polluters to different tax regimes. In this paper, I discuss the existing state and federal hazardous waste taxes and issues in their design and implementation. The paper then presents an empirical analysis of the tax rates adopted by states. In particular, the question is: do these taxes reflect the environmental costs of waste as opposed to other government objectives? Although an earlier study (Levinson, 2003) examines determinants of tax rates, the analysis here expands the hypothesized sources of variation and emphasizes the role of external costs. The results provide some evidence that taxes vary with environmental costs – making it possible that they improve welfare – but also point to non-environmental determinants and much unexplained variation. I then review the literature on the empirical effects of these taxes on pollution and economic behavior. Studies have found only small effects of the state taxes, but these effects indicate that waste generators and managers do respond to the incentives created by taxes. The following section evaluates the advantages and disadvantages of existing taxes on hazardous waste and proposes some alternatives. A final section briefly concludes with an assessment of the U.S. experience with these taxes.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisheren_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking papers / Rutgers University, Department of Economics 2003,06en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.stwSonderabfallen_US
dc.subject.stwÖkosteueren_US
dc.subject.stwLändersteueren_US
dc.subject.stwVereinigte Staatenen_US
dc.titleTaxing hazardous waste : the US experienceen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn375466851en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-
Appears in Collections:Working Papers, Department of Economics, Rutgers University

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
2003-06.pdf242.5 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.