|
EconStor >
Universität des Saarlandes (UdS) >
CSLE - Forschungsstelle zur Ökonomischen Analyse des Rechts, Universität des Saarlandes >
CSLE Discussion Paper Series, CSLE - Center for the Study of Law and Economics, Universität des Saarlandes >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10419/23040
|
| | |
| Title: | | "Third Party Contingency" contracts in settlement and litigation  |
| Authors: | | Kirstein, Roland Rickman, Neil |
| Issue Date: | | 2003 |
| Series/Report no.: | | CSLE Discussion Paper 2003-09 |
| Abstract: | | We present, for the first time, a model of recent institutional developments in litigation funding across several European jurisdictions. Recognizing the financing constraints that British cost rules may impose on litigants, these new contractual arrangements combine contingency fees with third party cover for cost in the event of losing the case: we call these ?Third Party Contingency? (TPC) contracts. Signing a TPC contract can make filing a suit credible and may increase settlement amounts. This does not, however, increase the likelihood of going to trial, since TPC contracts are only of mutual benefit to the plaintiff and the third party when the case settles out of court. We also find that the mere availability of TPCs may generate the above strategic effect. |
| Subjects: | | Contingent fees British cost allocation rule Legal Cost Insurance strategic moves |
| JEL: | | C7 K41 G22 |
| Document Type: | | Working Paper |
| Appears in Collections: | | CSLE Discussion Paper Series, CSLE - Center for the Study of Law and Economics, Universität des Saarlandes
|
| |
| | |
Download bibliographical data as:
BibTeX
|
| |
Share on:http://hdl.handle.net/10419/23040
|
Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|