Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/22974
Authors: 
Pope, Robin
Year of Publication: 
2006
Series/Report no.: 
Bonn econ discussion papers 2006,30
Abstract: 
It is here shown that the extension of expected utility theory to multiple periods destroys the axiomatic base by introducing timing contradictions in what the chooser knows at a single time point. It is shown that some of these timing contradictions remain even if, as Samuelson (1952) proposed, no segment of the outcome space (to which utility attaches) commences before all risk is passed.
Subjects: 
expected utility theory
rank dependent theories
axioms
single period
multiple period
timing contradictions
degree of knowledge ahead
JEL: 
D90
D81
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
292.51 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.