Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/22748
Authors: 
Siebe, Wilfried
Milde, Hellmuth
Broll, Udo
Bieta, Volker
Year of Publication: 
2007
Series/Report no.: 
Dresden discussion paper in economics 07/07
Abstract: 
Basel II changes risk management in banks strongly. Internal rating procedures would lead one to expect that banks are changing over to active risk control. But, if risk management is no longer a simple "game against nature", if all agents involved are active players then a shift from a non-strategic model setting (measuring event risk stochastically) to a more general strategic model setting (measuring behavioral risk adequately) comes true. Knowing that a game is any situation in which the players make strategic decisions – i.e., decisions that take into account each other's actions and responses – game theory is a useful set of tools for better understanding different risk settings. Embedded in a short history of the Basel Accord in this article we introduce some basic ideas of game theory in the context of rating procedures in accordance with Basel II. As well, some insight is given how game theory works. Here, the primary value of game theory stems from its focus on behavioral risk: risk when all agents are presumed rational, each attempting to anticipate likely actions and reactions by its rivals
Subjects: 
New Basel Accord
event risk
behavioral risk
rating
simple game
Nash-equilibrium
game theory
JEL: 
A22
A10
C79
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
349.24 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.