EconStor >
Technische Universität Dresden >
Institut für Wirtschaft und Verkehr, Technische Universität Dresden >
Diskussionsbeiträge aus dem Institut für Wirtschaft und Verkehr, TU Dresden >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/22699
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWieland, Bernharden_US
dc.contributor.authorSeidel, Tinaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMatthes, Andreasen_US
dc.contributor.authorSchlag, Bernharden_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-01-29T15:07:06Z-
dc.date.available2009-01-29T15:07:06Z-
dc.date.issued2004en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/22699-
dc.description.abstractThe last two decades have seen a substantial change in the basic philosophy underlying European transportation policy. Due to the Commission's efforts and due to supporting jurisdiction by the European Court of Justice the dominant approach to transportation policy has become far more market oriented. This change of approach in transportation policy will only be successful and sustainable if the problem of acceptability will be solved. For researchers this entails that their perspective must change from the normative to the positive aspects of transportation policy-making. This paper reports work undertaken within research project TIPP (Transportation Institutions in the Policy Process) funded by the European Commission. In this work it has been attempted to develop a theoretical structure that merges the positive economic theory of regulation with cognitive psychology and traffic psychology. This theoretical structure offers a matrix of actors and factors that are seen to be essential for success or failure in the implementation of a certain measure of transport policy. Four case studies were carried out in order to check the plausibility of this approach. The case studies are the failure of the German Railway (Deutsche Bahn AG) to introduce a new tariff system in passenger transport in the period 2002-2003, the attempt to introduce a toll for HGVs in Germany, the failure to operate a private tolled motorway in Hungary (M1/M15), the failure to introduce a road-pricing system in the densely populated Randstad area in the Netherlands.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDiskussionsbeiträge aus dem Institut für Wirtschaft und Verkehr 2/2004en_US
dc.subject.jelL91en_US
dc.subject.jelL9en_US
dc.subject.jelL51en_US
dc.subject.jelL98en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordTransportation Policyen_US
dc.subject.keywordEuropeen_US
dc.subject.keywordCommon Transport Policyen_US
dc.subject.keywordTransport Regulationen_US
dc.subject.keywordAcceptabilityen_US
dc.subject.stwEU-Verkehrspolitiken_US
dc.subject.stwVerkehrspolitiken_US
dc.subject.stwDeregulierungen_US
dc.subject.stwÖffentliche Meinungen_US
dc.subject.stwKognitionen_US
dc.subject.stwEU-Staatenen_US
dc.titleTransport Policy, Acceptance and the Mediaen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn476925886en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-
dc.identifier.repecRePEc:zbw:tudiwv:22004-
Appears in Collections:Diskussionsbeiträge aus dem Institut für Wirtschaft und Verkehr, TU Dresden

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
dskp204.pdf438.54 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.