EconStor >
Humboldt-Universität Berlin >
Department of Agricultural Economics and Social Sciences, Humboldt-Universität Berlin >
CEESA Discussion Papers, HU Berlin >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/22301
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRatinger, Tomásen_US
dc.contributor.authorKrumalová, Veronikaen_US
dc.contributor.authorPrazan, Jaroslaven_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-01-29T14:55:45Z-
dc.date.available2009-01-29T14:55:45Z-
dc.date.issued2004en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/22301-
dc.description.abstractThe paper focuses on changes in property rights and policies regarding interactions between agriculture and nature in the Czech Republic. In the first part the recent situation is reviewed. The institutional and organisational features and their development during the transition and recent years are illustrated by the case study on the White Carpathian protected landscape area. The key issue in conservation in the White Carpathians (as in the number of other marginal areas) is to maintain grassland management at large scale. While environmental policy lacks measures for maintaining grassland management, respective incentives were launched in the frame of agricultural policy, although they do not sufficiently consider environmental concerns. There are two other problem areas hampering efficient organisation of conservation: uncompleted land reform and little involvement of local population in determining conservation priorities. In the second part, the paper examines three policy options for enhancing sustainability of landscape and biodiversity on farmland. The proposed policy options each reflect the identified problems in the White Carpathian case study.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisheren_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCEESA discussion paper / Humboldt-Universität Berlin, Department of Agricultural Economics and Social Sciences 2004,1en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.stwBiodiversitäten_US
dc.subject.stwLandwirtschaften_US
dc.subject.stwAgrarverfassungen_US
dc.subject.stwTschechische Republiken_US
dc.subject.stwKarpatenen_US
dc.titleInstitutional options for the conservation of biodiversity : evidence from the Czech Republicen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn497508125en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-
Appears in Collections:CEESA Discussion Papers, HU Berlin

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
DP20_Ratinger_Krumalova_Prazan.pdf104.61 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.