EconStor >
Humboldt-Universität Berlin >
Department of Agricultural Economics and Social Sciences, Humboldt-Universität Berlin >
CEESA Discussion Papers, HU Berlin >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/22299
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWasilewski, Adamen_US
dc.contributor.authorSikor, Thomasen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-01-29T14:55:44Z-
dc.date.available2009-01-29T14:55:44Z-
dc.date.issued2003en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/22299-
dc.description.abstractThis paper seeks to contribute to the development of institutional options for the management of public goods in Central and Eastern Europe. It assesses the potential of different governance structures, including administrative hierarchies, market approaches, and efforts at local non-market co-ordination. The paper examines the management of public goods in Central and Eastern Europe through a study of open space management and urban sprawl in a semi-urban county near Warsaw, Poland. The protection of open space poses significant challenges to semi-urban land management, as its benefits cannot be captured by individual entities and accrue as much to urban residents as to local people. The concrete institutional options investigated comprehend the use of land registers for monitoring land conversion, establishment of land trusts in part financed by a development gains tax, and technical and organisational support for local environmental organisations. The evaluation of options builds on an analysis of causes underlying rapid land conversion in the past decade. The causal analysis demonstrates that privatisation and decentralisation have evoked the radical changes in land use. The demand for housing land motivated farmers to sell semi-urban land, as the state could not enforce its legal oversight over land use. Land conversion was driven by local alliances of farmers eager to "cash in" on their newly acquired rights of alienation, a broader rural society primarily interested in economic development, and local authorities lured by increasing tax revenues.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCEESA discussion paper / Humboldt-Universität Berlin, Department of Agricultural Economics and Social Sciences 18en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.stwNaturschutzen_US
dc.subject.stwBodennutzungen_US
dc.subject.stwBaulanden_US
dc.subject.stwPolenen_US
dc.titleInstitutional options for the protection of open space : evidence from Polanden_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn497506483en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-
Appears in Collections:CEESA Discussion Papers, HU Berlin

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
DP18_Wasilewski_Sikor.pdf79.05 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.