EconStor >
Humboldt-Universität Berlin >
Department of Agricultural Economics and Social Sciences, Humboldt-Universität Berlin >
CEESA Discussion Papers, HU Berlin >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/22294
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLaschewski, Lutzen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-01-29T14:55:42Z-
dc.date.available2009-01-29T14:55:42Z-
dc.date.issued2002en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/22294-
dc.description.abstractThis article raises the question of the constitution of rural society in postsocialist countries, and explores the possibilities of participatory approaches in rural development and resource management in face of given social conditions in the local context. The unifying scientific "idea" is currently associated with the concept of social capital. The ability to form social capital can be seen as a central prerequisite both for economic development and the protection of resources (that is, for sustainable development). An important element of this concept is the networking of the actors within the region and with external actors. As a result of historical development the network relations in the rural areas of East Germany have a specific structure. What is especially remarkable is the continuing dominant role of the representatives of the big agricultural enterprises in the important local network structures despite the obvious decline in the economic importance of these enterprises. The structures uncovered in the case studies can certainly be taken to reflect the reality of many local contexts. It is argued that, as far as the creation of the beginnings of participation in rural development and resource management are concerned, that if the peculiarities are ignored there is a danger that the existing network structures wills simply be strengthened through participatory development. Therefore, the important contributions of participatory approaches to the solution of concrete problems must be supplemented by the prospect of its social embedding in the context of rural development. At the same time it also became clear in the project that the success of developed attempts at problem solution can only be ensured if the higher political levels are prepared to devolve downwards.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisheren_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCEESA discussion paper / Humboldt-Universität Berlin, Department of Agricultural Economics and Social Sciences 12en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.stwLändliche Entwicklungsplanungen_US
dc.subject.stwKommunale Selbstverwaltungen_US
dc.subject.stwLandwirtschaftliche Bodennutzungen_US
dc.subject.stwUmweltschutzen_US
dc.subject.stwDeutschlanden_US
dc.titleSystems of local self-administration after agricultural transformation : experiences of a local resource management project in East Germanyen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn497503247en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-
Appears in Collections:CEESA Discussion Papers, HU Berlin

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
DP12_Laschewski.pdf50.44 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.