EconStor >
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin >
Department of Agricultural Economics and Social Sciences, Humboldt-Universität Berlin >
CEESA Discussion Papers, HU Berlin >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRatinger, Tomásen_US
dc.contributor.authorKrumalová, Veronikaen_US
dc.description.abstractAt the beginning of the transition, the economic decline of agriculture partially relaxed the pressure on the wildlife. However, the policy continued to concentrate on regulating the intensity of production rather then creating incentives to produce environmental qualities. The structural adjustment process in agriculture caused the low return (poor) land to be released from production, especially, in protection zones with severe environmental restrictions. Land abandonment resulted in a rapid degradation of wildlife and landscape in places where these natural values were legally protected. The article examines the organisation of the provision of landscape and wildlife in the White Carpathians protected landscape area after 1997, when the new agricultural legislation and policy recognised compensations for restrictions and has gradually introduced incentives to cultivate potentially abandoned land. It was found that there was more than one governance structure, and that these were not necessary supporting each other. Our investigation concluded that solving the conservation problem is not separable from the rural development problem of the region, and therefore, that there is a need for participation of local community in terms of contributing producers but mainly consumers of high natural values.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCEESA discussion paper / Humboldt-Universität Berlin, Department of Agricultural Economics and Social Sciences 6en_US
dc.titleProvision of environmental goods on potentially abandoned land : the White Carpathian protected landscape areaen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
Appears in Collections:CEESA Discussion Papers, HU Berlin

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
DP6_Ratinger.pdf150.11 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.