EconStor >
Christian-Albrechts-Universität Kiel (CAU) >
Department of Economics, Universität Kiel  >
Economics Working Papers, Department of Economics, CAU Kiel >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/21979
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFrondel, Manuelen_US
dc.contributor.authorHorbach, Jensen_US
dc.contributor.authorRennings, Klausen_US
dc.contributor.authorRequate, Tillen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-01-29T14:13:07Z-
dc.date.available2009-01-29T14:13:07Z-
dc.date.issued2004en_US
dc.identifier.piurn:nbn:de:101:1-200910132048-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/21979-
dc.description.abstractOn the basis of abundant facility and firm-level data for German manufacturing, originating from a recent OECD-survey, this paper empirically investigates the relevance of a variety of incentives for environmentally innovative behavior of facilities, the respective influence of pressure groups, and the impact of both regulatory and market-based policy instruments, such as eco-taxes. Since the early 1990s, Environmental Management Systems (EMS), specifically, have become a vital voluntary complement to mandatory environmental policies based on regulation and legislation. EMS may be perceived as an organizational environmental innovation that may lead to improved environmental performance. While the paper provides a descriptive analysis of the determinants for EMS-adoption and incentives that may trigger environmental innovation activities within German facilities, the major questions that will be addressed in this paper are: (1) How can public authorities support the introduction of management practices that may lead to improved environmental performance? (2) What are the main determinants of environmentally innovative behavior of firms? Specifically, we are interested in the role that market forces and regulation play in the process of complex firm decisions on innovation and environmental performance. While the relevant literature on these issues is dominated by case studies, our large-scale survey indicates that the most important reasons why firms contemplate introducing EMS are to improve the efforts to achieve regulatory compliance, to improve the corporate image, and to create cost savings with respect to both waste management and resource input. Among pressure groups, internal stakeholders - management employees and corporate headquarters - appear to be more influential with respect to EMS-adoption and environmental innovation than external forces, such as public authorities.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisheren_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEconomics working paper / Christian-Albrechts-Universität Kiel, Department of Economics 2004,02en_US
dc.subject.jelQ50en_US
dc.subject.jelL50en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordEnvironmental Management Systemsen_US
dc.subject.keywordEMASen_US
dc.subject.keywordEnvironmental Policy Instrumentsen_US
dc.subject.stwUmweltpolitiken_US
dc.subject.stwUmweltmanagementen_US
dc.subject.stwInnovationen_US
dc.subject.stwEinführungen_US
dc.subject.stwStakeholderen_US
dc.subject.stwDeutschlanden_US
dc.titleEnvironmental Policy Tools and Firm-Level Management Practices : Empirical Evidence for Germany.en_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn383684609en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-
dc.identifier.repecRePEc:zbw:cauewp:1689-
Appears in Collections:Economics Working Papers, Department of Economics, CAU Kiel

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
EWP-2004-02.pdf1.11 MBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.