EconStor >
Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (JLU) >
Zentrum für Internationale Entwicklungs- und Umweltforschung (ZEU), Universität Gießen >
Discussion Papers, ZEU, JLU Gießen >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/21926
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWestphal, Kirstenen_US
dc.contributor.authorLangenohl, Andreasen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-01-29T14:07:31Z-
dc.date.available2009-01-29T14:07:31Z-
dc.date.issued2006en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/21926-
dc.description.abstractOver the years Russia has become one of the most important partners of the European Union. Due to this fact a more democratic and modern Russia would have great benefits for the EU and might contribute to the stabilization of the European continent. But existing problems like terrorism, organized crime and environmental pollution are central challenges for the relationship and their solution demands for intensive cross-border cooperation. Therefore a clear strategy is needed in order to establish a successful cooperation. What strategy have the European politicians pursued and which influence have their plans exerted on the actual policy of the European Union? The European Union clearly accentuated the meaning of common values for the relationship towards the Russian Federation in the early and fundamental documents. However, it becomes more and more evident that in day-to-day policy there is a tendency to tolerate even substantial violations of the norms which originate from the concept of common values. One of the main causes for this behaviour is the strong economic interest of the EU towards Russia. For example, the Russian Federation supplies the EU with most of its energy resources, such as gas and oil. On the other hand the EU is the major trading partner of the Russian Federation. The notion of the common shared values is based – as stated in the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (PCA) and in the subsequent documents – on the principles of the Helsinki Final Act and the Charter of Paris. Because such principles are easily stated in a document their impact on the real policy has to be called into question and must be examined further in this essay.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisheren_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDiscussion Papers / Zentrum für internationale Entwicklungs- und Umweltforschung 30en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.titleComparing and Inter-Relating the European Union and the Russian Federation : Viewpoints from an international and interdisciplinary students' projecten_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn521137160en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-
dc.identifier.repecRePEc:zbw:zeudps:30-
Appears in Collections:Discussion Papers, ZEU, JLU Gießen

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
DiscPap30.pdf360.39 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.