EconStor >
Deutsche Bank Research, Frankfurt am Main >
Research Notes, Deutsche Bank Research >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/21884
  
Title:The "more economic approach" in EU merger control: A critical assessment PDF Logo
Authors:Christiansen, Arndt
Issue Date:2006
Series/Report no.:Research notes working paper series 21e
Abstract:With the "more economic approach" the EU is taking a new tack on merger control policy. This is visible not only in the new SIEC prohibition criterion and the criteria for appraising horizontal mergers but also in more recent decision-making practice. Greater legal certainty, on the one hand, and improved decision-making, on the other, have been cited as the aims of the (increased) use of industrial economics models and quantitative analysis. The objective of a (better) economic foundation in EU merger control is expressly welcomed. However, on closer analysis it is found that in point of fact the more economic approach in its present form creates less legal certainty, while the upshot in terms of the quality of the decision-making is at least unclear. At the same time, the (administrative) burden is likely to rise. Moreover, certain problems emerge for instance from the increasing involvement of economic experts or the possibilities for (industrial policy-related) political intervention. In conclusion, a broader perception of an economics-based approach which takes account especially of the institutional implications is called for. Specific recommendations are the establishment of an independent competition authority and the stronger orientation of merger control to (more) general rules.
Subjects:Competition policy
EU merger control
economic analysis
JEL:F02
K21
L40
Document Type:Working Paper
Appears in Collections:Research Notes, Deutsche Bank Research

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
PROD0000000000196093.pdf360.28 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX
Share on:http://hdl.handle.net/10419/21884

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.