Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/21380
Authors: 
Frölich, Markus
Year of Publication: 
2002
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion paper series 548
Abstract: 
Propensity score matching is widely used in treatment evaluation to estimate average treatment effects. Nevertheless, the role of the propensity score is still controversial. Since the propensity score is usually unknown and has to be estimated, the efficiency loss arising from not knowing the true propensity score is examined. Hahn (1998) derived the asymptotic variance bounds for known and unknown propensity scores. Whereas the variance of the average treatment effect is unaffected by knowledge of the propensity score, the bound for the treatment effect on the treated changes if the propensity score is known. However, the reasons for this remain unclear. In this paper it is shown that knowledge of the propensity score does not lead to a ?dimension reduction?. Instead it enables a more efficient estimation of the distribution of the confounding variables.
Subjects: 
evaluation
matching
causal effect
semiparametric efficiency bound
JEL: 
C14
C13
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
409.67 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.