Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/21364
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBrown, J. Daviden_US
dc.contributor.authorEarle, John S.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-01-28T16:21:44Z-
dc.date.available2009-01-28T16:21:44Z-
dc.date.issued2002en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/21364-
dc.description.abstractGross job and worker flows in Russian industry are studied using panel data from a recent survey of 530 firms selected through national probability sampling. The data permit an examination of several important measurement issues – including the timing and definition of employment, the roles of split-ups and mergers, and the relative magnitudes of rehiring and new hiring and of quits and layoffs – and they contain a rich set of firm characteristics thatmay affect job and worker turnover. The results imply that job destruction and worker separation rates in industrial firms rose in the early 1990s, as did job flows as a fraction of worker flows and layoffs as a fraction of separations. By contrast, job creation and worker hiring rates were flat until 1999, the former low and the latter surprisingly high. Heterogeneity in individual firm behavior increased throughout. New firms and old enterprises that havebeen reorganized display much larger flows compared with unreorganized enterprises. Unions appear to reduce worker flows, but the structure of neither product nor labor markets shows a significant impact. Private ownership has ambiguous effects: insider ownership, particularly by managers, is associated with higher worker flows and excess job reallocation, while outsider ownership, particularly by blockholders, is associated with lower flow rates. Ameasure of adjustment costs constructed from the worktime necessary to hire and train a new employee is strongly related to variables usually associated with adjustment costs, including worker wage, education, firm size, capital intensity, and labor productivity, but only weakly to job and worker turnover. Little evidence is found that firms? employment adjustments have become more sensitive to adjustment costs during the transition, but worker and manager ownership are associated with more sensitivity than are other types ofownership.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisher|aInstitute for the Study of Labor (IZA) |cBonnen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aIZA Discussion paper series |x564en_US
dc.subject.jelE24en_US
dc.subject.jelP23en_US
dc.subject.jelJ63en_US
dc.subject.jelJ23en_US
dc.subject.jelP31en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordjob creationen_US
dc.subject.keywordjob destructionen_US
dc.subject.keywordlabor turnoveren_US
dc.subject.keywordlayoffsen_US
dc.subject.keywordtransitionen_US
dc.subject.keywordRussiaen_US
dc.subject.stwIndustrielle Beschäftigungen_US
dc.subject.stwStrukturwandelen_US
dc.subject.stwArbeitsmobilitäten_US
dc.subject.stwPersonalabbauen_US
dc.subject.stwArbeitsnachfrageen_US
dc.subject.stwÜbergangswirtschaften_US
dc.subject.stwRußlanden_US
dc.titleThe Reallocation of Workers and Jobs in Russian Industry: New Evidence on Measures and Determinantsen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn845738828en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-

Files in This Item:
File
Size
480.28 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.