|
EconStor >
Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (IZA), Bonn >
IZA Discussion Papers, Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (IZA) >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10419/21305
|
| | |
| Title: | | Why Are Jobs Designed the Way They Are?  |
| Authors: | | Zoghi, Cindy Levenson, Alec Gibbs, Michael |
| Issue Date: | | 2005 |
| Series/Report no.: | | IZA Discussion paper series 1529 |
| Abstract: | | In this paper we study job design. Will an organization plan precisely how the job is to be done ex ante, or ask workers to determine the process as they go? We first model this decision and predict complementarity between these job attributes: multitasking, discretion, skills, and interdependence of tasks. We argue that characteristics of the firm and industry (e.g., product and technology, organizational change) can explain observed patterns and trends in job design. We then use novel data on these job attributes to examine these issues. As predicted, job designs tend to be ?coherent? across these characteristics within the same job. Job designs also tend to follow similar patterns across jobs in the same firm, and especially in the same establishment: when one job is optimized ex ante, others are more likely to be also. There is some evidence that firms may segregate different types of job designs across different establishments. |
| Subjects: | | job design organization design specialization job enrichment intrinsic motivation |
| JEL: | | J2 M50 L23 M5 J24 |
| Document Type: | | Working Paper |
| Appears in Collections: | | IZA Discussion Papers, Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (IZA)
|
| |
| | |
Download bibliographical data as:
BibTeX
|
| |
Share on:http://hdl.handle.net/10419/21305
|
Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|