|
EconStor >
Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (IZA), Bonn >
IZA Discussion Papers, Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (IZA) >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10419/21160
|
| | |
Full metadata record
| DC Field | | Value | | Language |
| dc.contributor.author | | Zoega, Gylfi | | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | | Francesconi, Marco | | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | | Booth, Alison L. | | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | | 2009-01-28T16:19:58Z | | - |
| dc.date.available | | 2009-01-28T16:19:58Z | | - |
| dc.date.issued | | 2002 | | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | | http://hdl.handle.net/10419/21160 | | - |
| dc.description.abstract | | In oligopsonistic labour markets, firms have some market power, and a wedge is created between wages and marginal product. When oligopsonistic firms' production technology requires generally trained workers, firms may therefore receive part of the returns to general training and be willing to pay for it despite its general nature. However this outcome is not efficient, in the sense that too few workers are trained and workers who are hired receive too little training. We consider how different institutions can affect this inefficiency. Industry-level minimum wages can remove the training inefficiency and provide workers with the right incentives to invest in general training. A training subsidy to firms can also be used to achieve first-best. Trade unions might also remedy the market failure, in two ways. First, if an industry-wide union has a direct say in the training decision and maximises the utility of a representative worker, it will choose the efficient level of training intensity. Second, firmspecific unions, through raising relative wages and reducing turnover, can increase training intensity. | | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | | eng | | en_US |
| dc.publisher | | | | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | | IZA Discussion paper series 618 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.jel | | E32 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.jel | | J23 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.jel | | J24 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.jel | | J54 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.ddc | | 330 | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | training | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | oligopsony | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | unions | | en_US |
| dc.subject.keyword | | minimum wages | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Betriebliche Bildungsarbeit | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Lohn | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Arbeitsmarkt | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Arbeitsnachfrage | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Oligopol | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Marktmacht | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Mindestlohn | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Berufsbildungspolitik | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Gewerkschaftliche Gewerkschaftlicher Organisationsgrad | | en_US |
| dc.subject.stw | | Theorie | | en_US |
| dc.title | | Oligopsony, Institutions and the Efficiency of General Training | | en_US |
| dc.type | | Working Paper | | en_US |
| dc.identifier.ppn | | 361404751 | | en_US |
| dc.rights | | http://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen | | - |
| Appears in Collections: | | IZA Discussion Papers, Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (IZA)
|
Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|