EconStor >
Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (IZA), Bonn >
IZA Discussion Papers, Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (IZA) >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/20732
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJunankar, P. N. (Raja)en_US
dc.contributor.authorMahuteau, St├ęphaneen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-01-28T16:16:19Z-
dc.date.available2009-01-28T16:16:19Z-
dc.date.issued2004en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/20732-
dc.description.abstractThis paper investigates the ease with which recent immigrants to Australia from different countries and with different visa categories enter employment at an appropriate level to their prior education and experience in the source country. Unlike most of the earlier research in this field that studied the labour market status of migrants (probabilities of employment, or unemployment, or participation, or wage equation) this paper focuses on the quality of job that the migrant obtains on arrival in Australia. We provide alternative definitions of what is a good job in terms of objective and subjective criteria. The paper uses two sets of the Longitudinal Survey of Immigrants to Australia data: the first cohort that arrived in 1993-95 and the second cohort that arrived in 1999-2000. In particular we would study how changes in social security legislation in 1997, (two year waiting period for eligibility for benefits) affected the quality of job held by new migrants. In comparing the behaviour of migrants in the labour market with and without access to social security benefits we would study whether migrants are more likely to accept bad jobs after the legislative changes. The paper uses bivariate probit models to estimate the probabilities of holding a good job in terms of the usual human capital and demographic variables (including the visa category for entry into Australia). Our results suggest that the policy change had a positive impact on the probability to find a job but a negative impact to hold a good job.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisheren_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesIZA Discussion paper series 1434en_US
dc.subject.jelJ61en_US
dc.subject.jelC25en_US
dc.subject.jelJ68en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordimmigrantsen_US
dc.subject.keywordimmigrant policiesen_US
dc.subject.keywordjob satisfactionen_US
dc.subject.keywordgood jobsen_US
dc.subject.keywordlabour market outcomesen_US
dc.subject.keywordbivariate probiten_US
dc.subject.stwMigrantenen_US
dc.subject.stwArbeitsplatzen_US
dc.subject.stwArbeitszufriedenheiten_US
dc.subject.stwSozialreformen_US
dc.subject.stwAustralienen_US
dc.titleDo Migrants Get Good Jobs? : New Migrant Settlement in Australiaen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn477714803en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-
Appears in Collections:IZA Discussion Papers, Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (IZA)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
dp1434.pdf397.6 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.