Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/20328
Authors: 
Bollinger, Christopher R.
Chandra, Amitabh
Year of Publication: 
2004
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion paper series 1093
Abstract: 
In empirical research it is common practice to use sensible rules of thumb for cleaning data. Measurement error is often the justification for removing (trimming) or recoding (winsorizing) observations whose values lie outside a specified range. We consider a general measurement error process that nests many plausible models. Analytic results demonstrate that winsorizing and trimming are only solutions for a narrow class of measurement error processes. Indeed, for the measurement error processes found in most social-science data, such procedures can induce or exacerbate bias, and even inflate the variance estimates. We term this source of bias ?Iatrogenic? (or econometrician induced) error. Monte Carlo simulations and empirical results from the Census PUMS data and 2001 CPS data demonstrate the fragility of trimming and winsorizing as solutions to measurement error in the dependent variable. Even on asymptotic variance and RMSE criteria, we are unable to find generalizable justifications for commonly used cleaning procedures.
Subjects: 
measurement error models
trimming
winsorizing
JEL: 
J1
C1
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
361.78 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.