EconStor >
Max-Planck-Institut für Ökonomik, Jena >
Discussion Papers on Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy, MPI für Ökonomik >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/19982
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAudretsch, David B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKeilbach, Maxen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-01-28T16:10:03Z-
dc.date.available2009-01-28T16:10:03Z-
dc.date.issued2004en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/19982-
dc.description.abstractThe literature focusing on the geography of entrepreneurship has developed something of a schizophrenic approach. On the one hand is a series of studies, which have tried to identify characteristics specific to particular regions that account for inter-spatial variations in entrepreneurship. On the other hand is a literature that has examined the impact of entrepreneurship on the economic performance of that region. While the emergence of a statistical link between economic performance and entrepreneurial activity is of considerable interest to both scholars and policy makers alike, it considers the amount of entrepreneurial activity specific to a region as an exogenous endowment. Thus, little guidance is provided as to how policy could actually influence economic performance by generating more entrepreneurial activity. The purpose of this paper is to explicitly link these two disparate literatures by suggesting that entrepreneurial activity is not exogenous, as this second strand of literature implies, but rather, as the earlier studies indicated, shaped by a number of factors specific to the particular location. Moreover, if entrepreneurship capital cannot be assumed to be exogenous, a single equation estimation would lead to biased results. We therefore estimate both equations simultaneously using three stage least square estimation. The empirical evidence suggests that the degree of spatially specific entrepreneurship capital is shaped by regional-specific factors reflecting both entrepreneurial opportunities and the entrepreneurial capabilities. In turn, the extent of entrepreneurship capital has a positive impact on regional economic performance.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisheren_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPapers on entrepreneurship, growth and public policy 3704en_US
dc.subject.jelO47en_US
dc.subject.jelO32en_US
dc.subject.jelM13en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordEntrepreneurshipen_US
dc.subject.keywordEconomic Outputen_US
dc.subject.keywordProduction Functionen_US
dc.subject.keywordEndogeneity Biasen_US
dc.subject.keywordThree Stage Least Squaresen_US
dc.subject.stwProduktionsfunktionen_US
dc.subject.stwProduktionsfaktoren_US
dc.subject.stwUnternehmeren_US
dc.subject.stwUnternehmensgründungen_US
dc.subject.stwSchätzungen_US
dc.subject.stwDeutschlanden_US
dc.titleEntrepreneurship capital : determinants and impacten_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn397703503en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-
Appears in Collections:Discussion Papers on Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy, MPI für Ökonomik

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
2004-37.pdf516.09 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.