EconStor >
Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Bonn >
Preprints of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/19895
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEngel, Christophen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-01-28T16:08:51Z-
dc.date.available2009-01-28T16:08:51Z-
dc.date.issued2004en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/19895-
dc.description.abstractJudges are obliged to give reasons for their decisions. A set of formal and informal norms specifies how this is to be done. These norms serve a whole array of purposes. This paper shows that one substantial effect is on decision quality. The effect can even be demonstrated on an ad hoc basis. Representation norms and the actual representation activity that is brought about by them have both a cognitive and a motivational effect. They palpably hold the judge accountable for the decision taken. And they guide him through the judgment elements inherent in his task. There is interplay between both effects when it comes to combating occasional non-normative motivation, debiasing and the choice of an appropriate decision mode. More importantly even than this short-term effect is the long-term power of representation norms. They exert this power as part and parcel of a richer institutional arrangement. That arrangement reminds the judge of the professional role he is playing, and it contributes to strengthening this attitude. And the institutional arrangement helps the judge in the process of progressive expertisation. Expertisation is no absolute protection against quality defects, but it is likely to significantly improve the quality of decisions. Suggestions for the deregulation of representation norms should pay due respect to the beneficial effect these norms have on the quality of decisions.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisheren_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPreprints of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2004/13en_US
dc.subject.jelC91en_US
dc.subject.jelK41en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordJudicial Decisionsen_US
dc.subject.keywordRepresentation Normsen_US
dc.subject.keywordAccountabilityen_US
dc.subject.keywordBiasesen_US
dc.subject.keywordDecision Modesen_US
dc.subject.keywordExpertisationen_US
dc.subject.stwRechtsprechungen_US
dc.subject.stwEntscheidungen_US
dc.subject.stwDienstleistungsqualitäten_US
dc.titleThe Impact of Representation Norms on the Quality of Judicial Decisionsen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn477637086en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-
Appears in Collections:Preprints of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
2004_13online.pdf389.92 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.