EconStor >
Deutsche Bundesbank, Forschungszentrum, Frankfurt am Main >
Discussion Paper Series 1: Economic Studies, Deutsche Bundesbank >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/19497
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGlück, Heinzen_US
dc.contributor.authorSchleicher, Stefan P.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-01-28T15:58:59Z-
dc.date.available2009-01-28T15:58:59Z-
dc.date.issued2004en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/19497-
dc.description.abstractWe start from the assertion that a useful monetary policy design should be founded on more realistic assumptions about what policymakers can know at the time when policy decisions have to be made. Since the Taylor rule – if used as an operational device - implies a forward looking behaviour, we analyze the reliability of the input information. We investigate the forecasting performance of OECD projections for GDP growth rates and inflation. We diagnose a much better forecasting record for inflation rates compared to GDP growth rates, which for most countries are almost uninformative at the time a Taylor rule should sensibly be applied. Using this data set, we find significant differences between Taylor rules estimated over revised data compared to real-time data. There is evidence that monetary policy seems to react more actively in real time than rules estimated over revised data suggest. Given the evidence of systematic errors in OECD forecasts, in a next step we attempt to correct for these forecast biases and check to which extent this can lower the errors in interest rate policy setting. An ex-ante simulation for the years 1991 to 2001 supports the proposal that correcting for forecast errors and biases based on an error model can lower the resulting policy error in interest rate setting for most countries under consideration. In addition we investigate to what extent structural changes in the policy reaction behaviour can be handled with moving instead of expanding samples. Our results point out that the information set available needs a careful examination when applied to instrument rules like those of the Taylor type. Limited forecast quality and significant data revisions recommend a more sophisticated handling of the dated information, for which we present an operational procedure that has the potential of reducing the risk of severe policy errors.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDiscussion paper Series 1 / Volkswirtschaftliches Forschungszentrum der Deutschen Bundesbank 2004,30en_US
dc.subject.jelC82en_US
dc.subject.jelC53en_US
dc.subject.jelE52en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordMonetary policy rulesen_US
dc.subject.keywordeconomic forecastingen_US
dc.subject.keywordOECDen_US
dc.subject.keywordreal-time dataen_US
dc.subject.stwKonjunkturprognoseen_US
dc.subject.stwPrognoseverfahrenen_US
dc.subject.stwStatistischer Fehleren_US
dc.subject.stwTaylor-Regelen_US
dc.subject.stwGeldpolitiken_US
dc.subject.stwSchätzungen_US
dc.subject.stwG-7-Staatenen_US
dc.titleForecast quality and simple instrument rules: a real-time data approachen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn473006650en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-
dc.identifier.repecRePEc:zbw:bubdp1:2296-
Appears in Collections:Discussion Paper Series 1: Economic Studies, Deutsche Bundesbank

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
200430dkp.pdf311.9 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.