Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/19013
Authors: 
Pethig, Rüdiger
Year of Publication: 
2005
Series/Report no.: 
CESifo working papers 1549
Abstract: 
In the environmental economics literature the standard approach of modeling nonlinear production and abatement processes is to treat waste emissions "simply as another factor of production" (Cropper and Oates 1992). That approach doesn't map the materials flow involved completely and hides, moreover, the exact links between production, residuals generation and abatement. This paper shows that production functions with emissions treated as inputs can be reconstructed as a subsystem of a comprehensive production-cum-abatement technology that is in line with the materials-balance principle. In a simple economy with full regard of the materials flow it also explores the consequences for allocative efficiency and efficiency-restoring taxation of multiple and interdependent residuals generated in the transformation processes of production, abatement and consumption. Finally, the paper demonstrates that efficiency may require setting the emissions tax rate above or below conventionally defined marginal abatement cost if the residual subject to abatement is not the only residual causing pollution.
Subjects: 
residuals
abatement
pollution
materials balance
JEL: 
Q50
Q52
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
243.6 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.