EconStor >
ifo Institut – Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung an der Universität München >
CESifo Working Papers, CESifo Group Munich >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/18869
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRaymond, Wladimiren_US
dc.contributor.authorMohnen, Pierre A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPalm, Franzen_US
dc.contributor.authorvan der Loeff, Sybrand Schimen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-01-28T15:53:27Z-
dc.date.available2009-01-28T15:53:27Z-
dc.date.issued2004en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/18869-
dc.description.abstractThe paper studies the degree of homogeneity of innovative behavior in order to determine empirically an industry classification of Dutch manufacturing that can be used for policy purposes. We use a twolimit tobit model with sample selection, which explains the decisions by business enterprises to innovate and the impact these decisions have on the share of innovative sales. The model is estimated for eleven industries based on the Dutch Standard Industrial Classification (SBI 1993). A likelihood ratio test (LR) is then performed to test for equality of the parameters across industries. We find that Dutch manufacturing consists of three groups of industries in terms of innovative behavior, a hightech group, a low-tech group and the industry of wood, where firms seem to have a rather different innovative behavior from the remaining industries. The same pattern shows up in the three Dutch Community Innovation Surveys.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCESifo working papers 1230en_US
dc.subject.jelO33en_US
dc.subject.jelO38en_US
dc.subject.jelC51en_US
dc.subject.jelC34en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordgeneralized tobiten_US
dc.subject.keywordhigh-tech industryen_US
dc.subject.keywordhomogeneityen_US
dc.subject.keywordinnovation policyen_US
dc.subject.keywordlikelihood ratio testen_US
dc.subject.keywordmodel of frictionen_US
dc.subject.keywordsample selectionen_US
dc.subject.stwInnovationen_US
dc.subject.stwVerarbeitendes Gewerbeen_US
dc.subject.stwKlassifikationen_US
dc.subject.stwTechnologieen_US
dc.subject.stwTobit-Modellen_US
dc.subject.stwSchätzungen_US
dc.subject.stwInnovationspolitiken_US
dc.subject.stwNiederlandeen_US
dc.titleAn empirically-based taxonomy of Dutch manufacturing : innovation policy implicationsen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn393375064en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-
Appears in Collections:CESifo Working Papers, CESifo Group Munich

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
cesifo1_wp1230.pdf383.98 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.