EconStor >
ifo Institut – Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung an der Universität München >
CESifo Working Papers, CESifo Group Munich >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/18827
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Huien_US
dc.contributor.authorWhalley, Johnen_US
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Shunmingen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-01-28T15:53:09Z-
dc.date.available2009-01-28T15:53:09Z-
dc.date.issued2005en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/18827-
dc.description.abstractThis paper considers liberalization of trade in both inter-temporal intermediation services and goods in a joint spatial-inter-temporal trade model. Joint multi-commodity spatial intertemporal models are not (to our knowledge) used in the trade literature as general comparative statics results are unavailable and (in the presence of incomplete markets) existence can also be an issue. Here we use numerical simulation methods. We first consider world with service trade autarky in which there is no domestic intermediation service provision, and service trade liberalization involves costless inter-temporal intermediation provided by foreign service providers. This simple treatment allows us to model service trade liberalization as removing period by period budget constraints for domestic consumers. In such a world, if nonzero tariffs apply to spatial trade we present an example showing how service trade liberalization can be welfare worsening. One implication is that negotiations on services in the WTO General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) need not be welfare improving if there are also ongoing tariff negotiations. We then expand the model to capture a more complex world where costly intermediation services can be provided by both withincountry and foreign providers. We again illustrate how services liberalization can be welfare worsening. We finally discuss whether welfare worsening service trade liberalization is likely in a real-world situation of highly restricted services trade and considerably more open goods trade, and when services trade are around 1/3 of total goods and services trade as is often claimed from available global service trade data.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisheren_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCESifo working papers 1463en_US
dc.subject.jelF11en_US
dc.subject.jelF00en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.stwInternationaler Dienstleistungsverkehren_US
dc.subject.stwAussenhandelsliberalisierungen_US
dc.subject.stwGATSen_US
dc.subject.stwAussenwirtschaftstheorieen_US
dc.subject.stwZwei-Länder-Modellen_US
dc.subject.stwZeitökonomiken_US
dc.subject.stwAllgemeines Gleichgewichten_US
dc.subject.stwWohlfahrtseffekten_US
dc.subject.stwTheorieen_US
dc.titleTrade liberalization in a joint spatial inter-temporal trade modelen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn48519712Xen_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-
Appears in Collections:CESifo Working Papers, CESifo Group Munich

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
cesifo1_wp1463.pdf866.87 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.