EconStor >
ifo Institut – Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung an der Universität München >
CESifo Working Papers, CESifo Group Munich >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/18791
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAngelopoulos, Konstantinosen_US
dc.contributor.authorPhilippopoulos, Apostolisen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-01-28T15:52:54Z-
dc.date.available2009-01-28T15:52:54Z-
dc.date.issued2005en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/18791-
dc.description.abstractIt is known that anti-social redistributive activities (rent seeking, tax evasion, corruption, violation of property rights, delay of socially beneficial reforms, etc) hurt the macroeconomy. But it is less known what is the role of government size as a determinant of such activities. We use data from 64 counties (both developed and developing) in 5-year periods over 1980- 2000. As a measure of anti-social activities, we use the ICRG index; as a measure of government size, we use the government share in GDP; and as a measure of government efficiency, we construct an index by following the methodology of Afonso, Schuknecht and Tanzi (2003). Our regressions show that what really matters to social incentives is the relation between size and efficiency. Specifically, while a larger size of government is bad for incentives when one ignores efficiency, the results change drastically when government efficiency is also taken into account. Only when our measure of size exceeds our measure of efficiency, larger public sectors are bad for incentives. By contrast, when efficiency exceeds size, larger public sectors are not bad; actually, in the case where efficiency is measured by government performance in the policy areas of administration, stabilization and infrastructure, larger public sectors significantly improve incentives.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisheren_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCESifo working papers 1427en_US
dc.subject.jelD7en_US
dc.subject.jelH11en_US
dc.subject.jelH3en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordgovernment and behaviour of agentsen_US
dc.subject.keywordcollective decision-makingen_US
dc.subject.stwStaatliche Einflussnahmeen_US
dc.subject.stwWirtschaftliche Effizienzen_US
dc.subject.stwÖkonomischer Anreizen_US
dc.subject.stwStaatsquoteen_US
dc.subject.stwRent Seekingen_US
dc.subject.stwSchätzungen_US
dc.subject.stwWelten_US
dc.titleThe role of government in anti-social redistributive activitiesen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn484748254en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-
Appears in Collections:CESifo Working Papers, CESifo Group Munich

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
cesifo1_wp1427.pdf513.31 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.