EconStor >
Institut für Weltwirtschaft (IfW), Kiel >
Kieler Arbeitspapiere, IfW >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10419/17862
  

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Kevin X. D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMeng, Qinglaien_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-01-28T14:59:59Z-
dc.date.available2009-01-28T14:59:59Z-
dc.date.issued2007en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/17862-
dc.description.abstractIn sticky price models with endogenous investment, virtually all monetary policy rules that set a nominal interest rate in response solely to future inflation induce real indeterminacy of equilibrium. Applying the Samuelson-Farebrother conditions, we obtain a necessary and su?cient condition for local real determinacy, which reveals that increasing price stickiness or letting policy respond also to current output may help ensure a unique equilibrium. We find that the first channel by itself has a quantitatively negligible effect and almost all strict inflation-targeting rules lead to indeterminacy, whether with higher price stickiness or overall stickiness by incorporating firm-specific capital, sticky wages, or both. The effect of the second avenue depends on labor supply elasticity and stickiness. With high labor supply elasticity and price stickiness, indeterminacy is much less likely to occur as policy also responds to output. With estimated labor supply elasticity or empirically reasonable price stickiness, policy's response to output helps little in ensuring determinacy; even incorporating firm-specific capital makes only a marginal improvement. Incorporating sticky wages, on the other hand, greatly enhances the role of policy's response to output in ensuring determinacy. With both sticky wages and firm-specific capital incorporated, even a tiny response of policy to current output can render equilibrium determinate for a wide range of response of policy to future inflation.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherKiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW) Kielen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesKieler Arbeitspapiere 1348en_US
dc.subject.jelE52en_US
dc.subject.jelE31en_US
dc.subject.jelE12en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordForward-looking inflation targetingen_US
dc.subject.keywordCurrent outputen_US
dc.subject.keywordSticky pricesen_US
dc.subject.keywordSticky wagesen_US
dc.subject.keywordFirm-specific capitalen_US
dc.subject.keywordEndogenous investmenten_US
dc.subject.keywordIndeterminacyen_US
dc.titleIs forward-looking inflation targeting destabilizing? : The role of policy's response to current output under endogenous investmenten_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn534972950en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-
Appears in Collections:Publikationen von Forscherinnen und Forschern des IfW
Kieler Arbeitspapiere, IfW

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
kap1348.pdf418.89 kBAdobe PDF
No. of Downloads: Counter Stats
Show simple item record
Download bibliographical data as: BibTeX

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.