Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/111234 
Authors: 
Year of Publication: 
2014
Series/Report no.: 
Working Paper No. 177
Publisher: 
University of Zurich, Department of Economics, Zurich
Abstract: 
Are monetary and non-monetary incentives used as substitutes in motivating effort? I address this question in a laboratory experiment in which the choice of the job characteristics (i.e., the mission) is part of the compensation package that principals can use to influence the agents' effort. Principals offer contracts that specify a piece rate and a charity - which can be either the preferred charity of the agent, or the one of the principal. The agents then exert a level of effort that generates a profif to the principal and a donation to the specified charity. My results show that the agents exert more effort than the level that maximizes their own pecuniary payoff in order to benefit the charity, especially their preferred one. The principals take advantage of this intrinsic motivation by offering lower piece rates and by using the choice of the charity as a substitute to motivate effort. However, I also find that because of fairness considerations, the majority of principals are reluctant to lower the piece rate below a fair threshold, making the substitution between monetary and non-monetary incentives imperfect. These findings have implications for the design of incentives in mission-oriented organizations and contribute to our understanding of job satisfaction and wage differentials across organizations and sectors.
Subjects: 
mission
intrinsic motivation
incentives
experiment
JEL: 
C92
J33
M52
M55
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
658.69 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.