Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/108538 
Year of Publication: 
2014
Series/Report no.: 
Jena Economic Research Papers No. 2014-031
Publisher: 
Friedrich Schiller University Jena and Max Planck Institute of Economics, Jena
Abstract: 
This paper studies the effects of social comparison on risk taking be- havior. In our framework, decision makers evaluate the consequences of their choices as changes with respect to both their own and their peers' conditions. We test experimentally whether different positions in the social ranking determine different risk attitudes. Subjects interact in a simulated workplace environment, where they receive possibly different wages as compensation for effort and then undertake a risky decision that may give them an extra gain. We find that social comparison matters for risk attitudes. In addition, risk aversion decreases with the size of social gains. As a consequence, subjects are less risk averse in social loss than in small social gain, whereas their risk attitudes do not differ between social loss and large social gain.
Subjects: 
interdependent preferences
reference point
risk aversion
social comparison
JEL: 
C91
D0
D81
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
510.91 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.