Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/102639
Year of Publication: 
2013
Series/Report no.: 
Working Paper No. 2013-1
Publisher: 
Brown University, Department of Economics, Providence, RI
Abstract: 
This chapter surveys the sizable and growing literature on coalition formation. We refer to theories in which one or more groups of agents (“coalitions”) deliberately get together to jointly determine their actions. The defining idea of a coalition, in this chapter, is that of a group which can coordinate agreements among its members, while it interacts noncooperatively with other non-member individuals and the outside world in general. It is hard to overstate the importance of coalition formation in economic, political and social analysis. Ray (2007) gives several examples in which such a framework comes to life: cartel formation, lobbies, customs unions, conflict, public goods provision, political party formation, and so on. Yet as one surveys the landscape of this area of research, the first feature that attracts attention is the fragmented nature of the literature. The theories that bear on our questions range from collusive behavior in repeated games, to models of bargaining, to cooperative game-theoretic notions of the core, or notions of coalition-proofness in noncooperative games. To unravel the many intricacies of this literature would take far more than a survey. To prevent our terms of inquiry from becoming unmanageably large, we impose a basic restriction.
Subjects: 
coalition formation
blocking
bargaining
farsightedness
coalition structures
core
stable set
JEL: 
C71
C72
C78
D71
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
632.71 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.