Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/101176 
Year of Publication: 
2011
Series/Report no.: 
ADBI Working Paper No. 338
Publisher: 
Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI), Tokyo
Abstract: 
Capital controls and exchange restrictions are used to restrict international capital flows during economic crises. This paper looks at the legal implications of these restrictions and explores the current international regulatory framework applicable to international capital movements and current payments. It shows how international capital flows suffer from the lack of a comprehensive and coherent regulatory framework that would harmonize the patchwork of multilateral, regional, and bilateral treaties that currently regulate this issue. These treaties include the Articles of Agreement of the International Monetary Fund (IMF Articles), the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS), free-trade agreements, the European Union treaty, bilateral investment treaties, and the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Code of Liberalization of Capital Movements (OECD Code of Capital Movement). Each of these instruments regulate differently capital movements with little coordination with other areas of law. This situation sometimes leads to regulatory overlaps and conflict between different sources of law. Given the strong links between capital movements and trade in services, this paper pays particular attention to the rules of the GATS on capital flows and discusses the policy space available in the GATS for restricting capital flows in times of crisis.
Subjects: 
capital controls
exchange restrictions
international capital flows
economic crises
JEL: 
F13
F31
F32
F53
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
126.59 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.